Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map

Share Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map on Facebook Share Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map on Twitter Share Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map on Linkedin Email Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map link

As we update Plan Tucson, a key question for our community is how best to plan for our city's future growth and evolution.

The Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity, using data & analysis from the Pima Association of Governments (PAG), expects Tucson's population will increase by approximately 77,000 between 2022 and 2060. The General Plan is a tool to plan how to meet our current and future needs for housing, infrastructure, amenities, and employment opportunities for our community.

Through careful planning, we can guide future growth and development and move our City in a positive direction. Plan Tucson, the citywide general plan, includes goals and policies to support our growing housing, services, and employment needs. One such policy is the illustrative "Future Growth Scenario Map."

The Future Growth Scenario Map is an important tool for shaping Tucson's future because it influences (but does not determine) land use and development. The map, developed using data on infrastructural capacity, development trends, and community preferences, depicts a citywide development pattern that can accommodate our anticipated population growth. How our city is designed and built, in turn, has implications for climate resilience, transportation, infrastructure, open space, and more.

Please see the FAQ section on the right-hand side to learn more about the Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map, including how it’s made and used.

Click "RESOURCES" on the right-hand side to learn how to interpret the Future Growth Scenario Map below. If you prefer to work on the Future Growth Scenario Map in a separate window, CLICK HERE.

Phase 2: Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map

Staff used community ideas and other data about our city to draft a Future Growth Scenario Map.
Please explore the draft scenario below and leave your comments.

Development Guidelines Feedback

Each Building Block presented on the Future Growth Scenario Map includes a set of Development Guidelines that are used by planners in the City's entitlements team when a proposed rezoning occurs. The development guidelines give technical specifics on what to look for in a rezoning application, including how the proposed rezoning would integrate into the surrounding areas, transportation concerns, and much more. Below are survey's geared to get your input on the draft guidelines to make sure the character of each building block reflects the community's vision for each area.

Guidelines for Development in all Areas of the City https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdfX3Jl4oigwhmqkkHtbxSL7ihywUfMxbLwP1dU4PVckJOUIw/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Neighborhood Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSczRyFLVZByNCVS_3F2M-pjlY2R7PHdoGEBVsi3uI6dyAduHw/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Neighborhood Center & Corridors Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfgVEnFYxoG-mH5jJzYXoD3paPkDaadfBlwYm2FNCQJcZLG7Q/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Mixed-Use Corridors Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdZBn2UI90w7SwA8JHHd-CUGMThL9xjgNbuTEM76ZlF94bi3g/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Mixed-Use Centers Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdrssDUPaSpWxLxnCtkD4fkRANp6hX3x0RYh0AJAWQzP7Tbrg/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Downtown Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfL6i_mML7_qHCoRcIXg_SfzAROXCQFxcmCZNLHU4jvWw-5Kg/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Business Centers Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd2OgC02ltdAksEWnn7IWr-M8QIIe6KlPSkLq7PkUkaOoyNoQ/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Industrial Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfK4xSYd5D0hwe3nRfE9VDNI1enA39iPfJlgrPg2Ug_zd0rNA/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Houghton Corridor & Southlands Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSei0iME-Qgr5xkODILBKEYMp1Ov9QlzBNS53Y2L1ObzCC88Yw/viewform?usp=sf_link

As we update Plan Tucson, a key question for our community is how best to plan for our city's future growth and evolution.

The Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity, using data & analysis from the Pima Association of Governments (PAG), expects Tucson's population will increase by approximately 77,000 between 2022 and 2060. The General Plan is a tool to plan how to meet our current and future needs for housing, infrastructure, amenities, and employment opportunities for our community.

Through careful planning, we can guide future growth and development and move our City in a positive direction. Plan Tucson, the citywide general plan, includes goals and policies to support our growing housing, services, and employment needs. One such policy is the illustrative "Future Growth Scenario Map."

The Future Growth Scenario Map is an important tool for shaping Tucson's future because it influences (but does not determine) land use and development. The map, developed using data on infrastructural capacity, development trends, and community preferences, depicts a citywide development pattern that can accommodate our anticipated population growth. How our city is designed and built, in turn, has implications for climate resilience, transportation, infrastructure, open space, and more.

Please see the FAQ section on the right-hand side to learn more about the Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map, including how it’s made and used.

Click "RESOURCES" on the right-hand side to learn how to interpret the Future Growth Scenario Map below. If you prefer to work on the Future Growth Scenario Map in a separate window, CLICK HERE.

Phase 2: Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map

Staff used community ideas and other data about our city to draft a Future Growth Scenario Map.
Please explore the draft scenario below and leave your comments.

Development Guidelines Feedback

Each Building Block presented on the Future Growth Scenario Map includes a set of Development Guidelines that are used by planners in the City's entitlements team when a proposed rezoning occurs. The development guidelines give technical specifics on what to look for in a rezoning application, including how the proposed rezoning would integrate into the surrounding areas, transportation concerns, and much more. Below are survey's geared to get your input on the draft guidelines to make sure the character of each building block reflects the community's vision for each area.

Guidelines for Development in all Areas of the City https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdfX3Jl4oigwhmqkkHtbxSL7ihywUfMxbLwP1dU4PVckJOUIw/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Neighborhood Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSczRyFLVZByNCVS_3F2M-pjlY2R7PHdoGEBVsi3uI6dyAduHw/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Neighborhood Center & Corridors Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfgVEnFYxoG-mH5jJzYXoD3paPkDaadfBlwYm2FNCQJcZLG7Q/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Mixed-Use Corridors Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdZBn2UI90w7SwA8JHHd-CUGMThL9xjgNbuTEM76ZlF94bi3g/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Mixed-Use Centers Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdrssDUPaSpWxLxnCtkD4fkRANp6hX3x0RYh0AJAWQzP7Tbrg/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Downtown Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfL6i_mML7_qHCoRcIXg_SfzAROXCQFxcmCZNLHU4jvWw-5Kg/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Business Centers Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd2OgC02ltdAksEWnn7IWr-M8QIIe6KlPSkLq7PkUkaOoyNoQ/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Industrial Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfK4xSYd5D0hwe3nRfE9VDNI1enA39iPfJlgrPg2Ug_zd0rNA/viewform?usp=sf_link

Guidelines for Development in the Houghton Corridor & Southlands Building Block https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSei0iME-Qgr5xkODILBKEYMp1Ov9QlzBNS53Y2L1ObzCC88Yw/viewform?usp=sf_link

What questions do you have about the Plan Tucson Future Growth Scenario Map?

loader image
Forgot password?
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Hello! Is there currently any plan to reduce/get rid of parking minimums and lower the prioritization of free parking over walkability, safety, and heat mitigation? Parking lots cost a huge amount for upkeep, create superheated wastelands of empty asphalt, and take huge amounts of land that could be used for better (taxable!) more human-friendly architecture. Cars cause so much pollution and death, and worsen climate change. Business owners and the people of Tucson should be able to choose to spend less money on nearly empty parking lots and more on what we need. This would also help lower prices as land/upkeep is so expensive. Our dependency on cars is killing us, and reducing free parking and forced parking minimums is an important way to prioritize humans over giant killing machines. Thank you! on Facebook Share Hello! Is there currently any plan to reduce/get rid of parking minimums and lower the prioritization of free parking over walkability, safety, and heat mitigation? Parking lots cost a huge amount for upkeep, create superheated wastelands of empty asphalt, and take huge amounts of land that could be used for better (taxable!) more human-friendly architecture. Cars cause so much pollution and death, and worsen climate change. Business owners and the people of Tucson should be able to choose to spend less money on nearly empty parking lots and more on what we need. This would also help lower prices as land/upkeep is so expensive. Our dependency on cars is killing us, and reducing free parking and forced parking minimums is an important way to prioritize humans over giant killing machines. Thank you! on Twitter Share Hello! Is there currently any plan to reduce/get rid of parking minimums and lower the prioritization of free parking over walkability, safety, and heat mitigation? Parking lots cost a huge amount for upkeep, create superheated wastelands of empty asphalt, and take huge amounts of land that could be used for better (taxable!) more human-friendly architecture. Cars cause so much pollution and death, and worsen climate change. Business owners and the people of Tucson should be able to choose to spend less money on nearly empty parking lots and more on what we need. This would also help lower prices as land/upkeep is so expensive. Our dependency on cars is killing us, and reducing free parking and forced parking minimums is an important way to prioritize humans over giant killing machines. Thank you! on Linkedin Email Hello! Is there currently any plan to reduce/get rid of parking minimums and lower the prioritization of free parking over walkability, safety, and heat mitigation? Parking lots cost a huge amount for upkeep, create superheated wastelands of empty asphalt, and take huge amounts of land that could be used for better (taxable!) more human-friendly architecture. Cars cause so much pollution and death, and worsen climate change. Business owners and the people of Tucson should be able to choose to spend less money on nearly empty parking lots and more on what we need. This would also help lower prices as land/upkeep is so expensive. Our dependency on cars is killing us, and reducing free parking and forced parking minimums is an important way to prioritize humans over giant killing machines. Thank you! link

    Hello! Is there currently any plan to reduce/get rid of parking minimums and lower the prioritization of free parking over walkability, safety, and heat mitigation? Parking lots cost a huge amount for upkeep, create superheated wastelands of empty asphalt, and take huge amounts of land that could be used for better (taxable!) more human-friendly architecture. Cars cause so much pollution and death, and worsen climate change. Business owners and the people of Tucson should be able to choose to spend less money on nearly empty parking lots and more on what we need. This would also help lower prices as land/upkeep is so expensive. Our dependency on cars is killing us, and reducing free parking and forced parking minimums is an important way to prioritize humans over giant killing machines. Thank you!

    Marina asked 17 days ago

    Thank you for your comment. Parking is discussed in goal 20 as well as goal 18 and 17

  • Share How are we encouraging infill development and increasing the density of tucson? We must move away from suburbia and car dependency if we are to take the climate emergency seriously. Also how are medium to high density options actually affordable to tucson families? Can Tucson invest in quality public housing to combat the rising rents?I've seen an increase in "Luxury" apartments that charge over $1000 a month for a studio - that doesn't help any body on Facebook Share How are we encouraging infill development and increasing the density of tucson? We must move away from suburbia and car dependency if we are to take the climate emergency seriously. Also how are medium to high density options actually affordable to tucson families? Can Tucson invest in quality public housing to combat the rising rents?I've seen an increase in "Luxury" apartments that charge over $1000 a month for a studio - that doesn't help any body on Twitter Share How are we encouraging infill development and increasing the density of tucson? We must move away from suburbia and car dependency if we are to take the climate emergency seriously. Also how are medium to high density options actually affordable to tucson families? Can Tucson invest in quality public housing to combat the rising rents?I've seen an increase in "Luxury" apartments that charge over $1000 a month for a studio - that doesn't help any body on Linkedin Email How are we encouraging infill development and increasing the density of tucson? We must move away from suburbia and car dependency if we are to take the climate emergency seriously. Also how are medium to high density options actually affordable to tucson families? Can Tucson invest in quality public housing to combat the rising rents?I've seen an increase in "Luxury" apartments that charge over $1000 a month for a studio - that doesn't help any body link

    How are we encouraging infill development and increasing the density of tucson? We must move away from suburbia and car dependency if we are to take the climate emergency seriously. Also how are medium to high density options actually affordable to tucson families? Can Tucson invest in quality public housing to combat the rising rents?I've seen an increase in "Luxury" apartments that charge over $1000 a month for a studio - that doesn't help any body

    Dario asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your comments and questions. 

  • Share There is insufficient information in this map to comment responsibly on the direction. I find that odd and disingenuous. Obviously, density should be mandated and sprawl-induced development curtailed dramatically. The reasons for this center around climate change, livability, and maintenance costs. Adding more asphalt and stoplights doesn’t benefit the quality of life or taxpayer wallets. It also increases drive time. Tucson likes to talk a good game on its bicycling infrastructure; however, it’s a lie. The Loop is a great achievement but bike boulevards are silly and a waste of money because they relegate bicyclists to a permanent second tier class. Incorporate separate bike lanes on main routes. Make it easier for bicyclists to get where they’re going. Pedestrians are given no comfortable, secure and shady sidewalks in most of the city so few walkers are seen anywhere. Why are potential walkers not a priority? Why such an emphasis on cars in a city that ranks third per capita in traffic fatalities? Shouldn’t this fact be alarming to city leaders? Look, if cars are still going to be favored in future growth, can the city start incorporating roundabouts like other cities and towns, including some in Arizona? Traffic signals are very expensive to purchase and maintain. Roundabouts reduce accidents and save money. Finally, can someone spearhead an effort to fix Tucson’s traffic signals that employ the left turn arrow after, not before, the green light to drive straight ahead? It’s the only city in the country that does this and it’s quite dangerous. on Facebook Share There is insufficient information in this map to comment responsibly on the direction. I find that odd and disingenuous. Obviously, density should be mandated and sprawl-induced development curtailed dramatically. The reasons for this center around climate change, livability, and maintenance costs. Adding more asphalt and stoplights doesn’t benefit the quality of life or taxpayer wallets. It also increases drive time. Tucson likes to talk a good game on its bicycling infrastructure; however, it’s a lie. The Loop is a great achievement but bike boulevards are silly and a waste of money because they relegate bicyclists to a permanent second tier class. Incorporate separate bike lanes on main routes. Make it easier for bicyclists to get where they’re going. Pedestrians are given no comfortable, secure and shady sidewalks in most of the city so few walkers are seen anywhere. Why are potential walkers not a priority? Why such an emphasis on cars in a city that ranks third per capita in traffic fatalities? Shouldn’t this fact be alarming to city leaders? Look, if cars are still going to be favored in future growth, can the city start incorporating roundabouts like other cities and towns, including some in Arizona? Traffic signals are very expensive to purchase and maintain. Roundabouts reduce accidents and save money. Finally, can someone spearhead an effort to fix Tucson’s traffic signals that employ the left turn arrow after, not before, the green light to drive straight ahead? It’s the only city in the country that does this and it’s quite dangerous. on Twitter Share There is insufficient information in this map to comment responsibly on the direction. I find that odd and disingenuous. Obviously, density should be mandated and sprawl-induced development curtailed dramatically. The reasons for this center around climate change, livability, and maintenance costs. Adding more asphalt and stoplights doesn’t benefit the quality of life or taxpayer wallets. It also increases drive time. Tucson likes to talk a good game on its bicycling infrastructure; however, it’s a lie. The Loop is a great achievement but bike boulevards are silly and a waste of money because they relegate bicyclists to a permanent second tier class. Incorporate separate bike lanes on main routes. Make it easier for bicyclists to get where they’re going. Pedestrians are given no comfortable, secure and shady sidewalks in most of the city so few walkers are seen anywhere. Why are potential walkers not a priority? Why such an emphasis on cars in a city that ranks third per capita in traffic fatalities? Shouldn’t this fact be alarming to city leaders? Look, if cars are still going to be favored in future growth, can the city start incorporating roundabouts like other cities and towns, including some in Arizona? Traffic signals are very expensive to purchase and maintain. Roundabouts reduce accidents and save money. Finally, can someone spearhead an effort to fix Tucson’s traffic signals that employ the left turn arrow after, not before, the green light to drive straight ahead? It’s the only city in the country that does this and it’s quite dangerous. on Linkedin Email There is insufficient information in this map to comment responsibly on the direction. I find that odd and disingenuous. Obviously, density should be mandated and sprawl-induced development curtailed dramatically. The reasons for this center around climate change, livability, and maintenance costs. Adding more asphalt and stoplights doesn’t benefit the quality of life or taxpayer wallets. It also increases drive time. Tucson likes to talk a good game on its bicycling infrastructure; however, it’s a lie. The Loop is a great achievement but bike boulevards are silly and a waste of money because they relegate bicyclists to a permanent second tier class. Incorporate separate bike lanes on main routes. Make it easier for bicyclists to get where they’re going. Pedestrians are given no comfortable, secure and shady sidewalks in most of the city so few walkers are seen anywhere. Why are potential walkers not a priority? Why such an emphasis on cars in a city that ranks third per capita in traffic fatalities? Shouldn’t this fact be alarming to city leaders? Look, if cars are still going to be favored in future growth, can the city start incorporating roundabouts like other cities and towns, including some in Arizona? Traffic signals are very expensive to purchase and maintain. Roundabouts reduce accidents and save money. Finally, can someone spearhead an effort to fix Tucson’s traffic signals that employ the left turn arrow after, not before, the green light to drive straight ahead? It’s the only city in the country that does this and it’s quite dangerous. link

    There is insufficient information in this map to comment responsibly on the direction. I find that odd and disingenuous. Obviously, density should be mandated and sprawl-induced development curtailed dramatically. The reasons for this center around climate change, livability, and maintenance costs. Adding more asphalt and stoplights doesn’t benefit the quality of life or taxpayer wallets. It also increases drive time. Tucson likes to talk a good game on its bicycling infrastructure; however, it’s a lie. The Loop is a great achievement but bike boulevards are silly and a waste of money because they relegate bicyclists to a permanent second tier class. Incorporate separate bike lanes on main routes. Make it easier for bicyclists to get where they’re going. Pedestrians are given no comfortable, secure and shady sidewalks in most of the city so few walkers are seen anywhere. Why are potential walkers not a priority? Why such an emphasis on cars in a city that ranks third per capita in traffic fatalities? Shouldn’t this fact be alarming to city leaders? Look, if cars are still going to be favored in future growth, can the city start incorporating roundabouts like other cities and towns, including some in Arizona? Traffic signals are very expensive to purchase and maintain. Roundabouts reduce accidents and save money. Finally, can someone spearhead an effort to fix Tucson’s traffic signals that employ the left turn arrow after, not before, the green light to drive straight ahead? It’s the only city in the country that does this and it’s quite dangerous.

    Paul asked 15 days ago

    Thanks for your comments. The preliminary draft was developed with the initial round of public input in mind, which showed support for transportation-oriented development that you describe. 

  • Share What programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill commercial development in midtown? on Facebook Share What programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill commercial development in midtown? on Twitter Share What programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill commercial development in midtown? on Linkedin Email What programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill commercial development in midtown? link

    What programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill commercial development in midtown?

    Greta asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your question.

  • Share What are the programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill development in midtown, and beyond? What affordable housing programs, policies and incentives are being worked ? on Facebook Share What are the programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill development in midtown, and beyond? What affordable housing programs, policies and incentives are being worked ? on Twitter Share What are the programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill development in midtown, and beyond? What affordable housing programs, policies and incentives are being worked ? on Linkedin Email What are the programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill development in midtown, and beyond? What affordable housing programs, policies and incentives are being worked ? link

    What are the programs, policies and incentives are being worked on for more infill development in midtown, and beyond? What affordable housing programs, policies and incentives are being worked ?

    Greta asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your question.

  • Share Can more high-rise housing construction be prevented along the Grant corridor? These complexes are a magnet for crime, and their height degrades the quality of life for adjoining neighborhoods. on Facebook Share Can more high-rise housing construction be prevented along the Grant corridor? These complexes are a magnet for crime, and their height degrades the quality of life for adjoining neighborhoods. on Twitter Share Can more high-rise housing construction be prevented along the Grant corridor? These complexes are a magnet for crime, and their height degrades the quality of life for adjoining neighborhoods. on Linkedin Email Can more high-rise housing construction be prevented along the Grant corridor? These complexes are a magnet for crime, and their height degrades the quality of life for adjoining neighborhoods. link

    Can more high-rise housing construction be prevented along the Grant corridor? These complexes are a magnet for crime, and their height degrades the quality of life for adjoining neighborhoods.

    lavpvna asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your comment and question.

  • Share What is the priority to retain significant patches of habitat in the city, rather than filling in such areas with development of any type? Percentage of land for habitat per some unit would be best way to set a goal for preservation. on Facebook Share What is the priority to retain significant patches of habitat in the city, rather than filling in such areas with development of any type? Percentage of land for habitat per some unit would be best way to set a goal for preservation. on Twitter Share What is the priority to retain significant patches of habitat in the city, rather than filling in such areas with development of any type? Percentage of land for habitat per some unit would be best way to set a goal for preservation. on Linkedin Email What is the priority to retain significant patches of habitat in the city, rather than filling in such areas with development of any type? Percentage of land for habitat per some unit would be best way to set a goal for preservation. link

    What is the priority to retain significant patches of habitat in the city, rather than filling in such areas with development of any type? Percentage of land for habitat per some unit would be best way to set a goal for preservation.

    Fern asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your question

  • Share What does it take to put in a dog park. Out in rural areas. Kinney and Western way area. Housing developments in area restricted pet walking. on Facebook Share What does it take to put in a dog park. Out in rural areas. Kinney and Western way area. Housing developments in area restricted pet walking. on Twitter Share What does it take to put in a dog park. Out in rural areas. Kinney and Western way area. Housing developments in area restricted pet walking. on Linkedin Email What does it take to put in a dog park. Out in rural areas. Kinney and Western way area. Housing developments in area restricted pet walking. link

    What does it take to put in a dog park. Out in rural areas. Kinney and Western way area. Housing developments in area restricted pet walking.

    Fred asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your comment. I've passed your comment to the Parks and Recreation Department.

  • Share Thank you for offering this summary, yet I have to admit being somewhat skeptical of any productive influence or control that the City of Tucson could offer regarding future growth and development. on Facebook Share Thank you for offering this summary, yet I have to admit being somewhat skeptical of any productive influence or control that the City of Tucson could offer regarding future growth and development. on Twitter Share Thank you for offering this summary, yet I have to admit being somewhat skeptical of any productive influence or control that the City of Tucson could offer regarding future growth and development. on Linkedin Email Thank you for offering this summary, yet I have to admit being somewhat skeptical of any productive influence or control that the City of Tucson could offer regarding future growth and development. link

    Thank you for offering this summary, yet I have to admit being somewhat skeptical of any productive influence or control that the City of Tucson could offer regarding future growth and development.

    Tim O asked 3 months ago

    Thank you for your comment

  • Share I'm very concerned about the "Southlands." Essentially, this will be a second Tucson. It will need infrastructure, water, etc. that will be incredibly costly and, in the case of water, in short supply. As much as possible of this area should be preserved as open space. on Facebook Share I'm very concerned about the "Southlands." Essentially, this will be a second Tucson. It will need infrastructure, water, etc. that will be incredibly costly and, in the case of water, in short supply. As much as possible of this area should be preserved as open space. on Twitter Share I'm very concerned about the "Southlands." Essentially, this will be a second Tucson. It will need infrastructure, water, etc. that will be incredibly costly and, in the case of water, in short supply. As much as possible of this area should be preserved as open space. on Linkedin Email I'm very concerned about the "Southlands." Essentially, this will be a second Tucson. It will need infrastructure, water, etc. that will be incredibly costly and, in the case of water, in short supply. As much as possible of this area should be preserved as open space. link

    I'm very concerned about the "Southlands." Essentially, this will be a second Tucson. It will need infrastructure, water, etc. that will be incredibly costly and, in the case of water, in short supply. As much as possible of this area should be preserved as open space.

    Gayle Hartmann asked 24 days ago

    Thank you for your comment.